We recently received a
request from the Select Board posing a series of questions to the School
Committee Chair and Superintendent. We have submitted our answers to the Select
Board and, in the spirit of fostering improved communications among all, are sharing
several of the questions that pertain directly to the schools on the LPS
website. A few questions that were not included below were either a.
confidential in nature; or b. not relevant to the education process or student
services.
On Wednesday, December 1st from 6:30-7:30 p.m.
we will be hosting our monthly Superintendent’s Advisory Council meeting.
During this virtual meeting, we will provide updates on the state of the school
and discuss some frequently asked questions. Interested parents and community
members are invited to join us. The link will be posted on the LPS website,
Wednesday, December 1st at noon. We look forward to your
participation.
1. The School has posted for many positions
lately, from management to entry level. Why are there so many openings?
A: We are not
immune to “The Great Resignation Era” that is happening across the country. The
pandemic has changed the way people think about their jobs and families. Each
person who has resigned had his/her own reason for leaving and we keep that
information confidential.
B. With more than 200
employees, the school department frequently has open positions.
2. Please explain the reasoning and process
behind the decision to hire an assistant superintendent and why his contract
was not voted on in open session. How could the assistant superintendent
be hired and start date set before any contract, or discussion by the School
Committee ever took place?
The School Committee had
discussed hiring an assistant superintendent for many years. We developed
the following FAQ on our school website that will answer your questions about
the process: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wK9Qxg2yr9OdBKzcOvqBWP91KaKnKCKAGNsb8VZF1Wk/edit
3. How could the assistant
superintendent be hired and start date set before any contract, or discussion
by the School Committee took place?
In order for a
candidate to give adequate notice at his/her former job, it is a customary
practice to offer a hire letter for reasonable assurance of a position. The
hire letter states, “pending approval of the School Committee on August 25,
2021.” As part of the interview process, the Superintendent always asks
candidates, regardless of the position, on what date they are able to start
work.
4. Please explain the
source of funds for the following:
a. $500,000 in charges
associated with the oil leak that exceed insurance coverage
b. $150,000 to pay for
the new assistant superintendent?
A. We allocated funds at the end of FY21 to
cover the oil spill.
B. The Assistant Superintendent’s position was
funded through the elimination of the Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and
Assessment’s position. Because the Assistant Superintendent’s salary was
prorated and there was a lapse in the staff salary expenses, no additional
funding was required. The Assistant Superintendent’s salary is $135,000.
5. Why are the school buildings in such poor
shape?
A: Years of
underfunding and lack of preventative maintenance for decades has brought us to
the current state. Schools sometimes must make the difficult choice of cutting
teachers, services or preventative maintenance, as the town often cannot
support yearly operating costs.
6. Please explain why a recent records request
for maintenance records was answered stating that none were available.
The request, made in
August, was for the following specific documents: “Inspection records for
any/all inspection records/results for the generators that pertain to NFPA 99
and NFPA 110 for the previous 10 years. Monthly 30 min testing maintenance
checklist for both generators as well by a contracted company.” The requestor
amended the timeframe from 10 years to 2 years.
After a search by IT, no documents that responded to the specific
request were located.
7. The School Committee
has been accused of violating the Open Meeting Law on several occasions. Please
list the complaints filed, and their status with the Attorney General.
Complaint
Made By
|
Status
with AG
|
Matt
Joseph
|
Pending
|
Joel
Hart
|
Unknown
|
Tammy
Tebo
|
Completed
|
Dylan
Lambert
|
Pending
|
Tammy
Tebo
|
Unknown
|
Tammy
Tebo
|
Unknown
|
8. The School Committee recently voted to have
School Counsel answer questions and handle public records requests. These
matters normally can be handled by staff. Please explain the reasoning for
voting to have School Counsel address questions and records requests.
The school has received a
significant number of public records requests over the last 2-3 months. As the
RAO, the Superintendent has answered many of the requests with the assistance
of LPS staff. Others have been referred to School Counsel for response due to
the need for legal advice and/or due to the volume of requests received.
9. Please provide the
amount of legal fees paid on items 7 and 8 above.
A: #7 - $8,547.28;
#8 - $11,613. = $20,160.28
10. Why was the Town not notified of the oil
leak right away? Please provide a final estimated cost for the oil spill and
the anticipated completion dates as well as any concerns for long term air
quality in Rooms 105-107 of the Elementary School.
A. The Town was notified right away. The
school’s Director of Finance & Operations notified the Assistant Town
Administrator on the same day the school learned of the leak.
B. The school does not yet have a final
estimated cost or anticipated completion dates.
C. Please refer to the air quality reports on
the Town’s website: https://www.leicesterma.org/home/pages/oil-incident
11. Please explain the reasoning for the
transfer from the special education stabilization fund that was recently voted
by the Select Board. For what purpose are these funds being used?
The Special Education
Stabilization Fund allows the expenditure for tuition and transportation that
are not budgeted. Once the budget closed, there were students who
transitioned to other placements and the funds to cover those expenses are
charged to the stabilization account. In the event there are any savings
in the general fund, we shift money back to the stabilization account. This is
an allowable practice that has been done every year.
12. There was a recent charge of $1,050 to
process a public records request for documents relating to the new assistant
superintendent. The charge indicates that there are many records to be
provided. Please explain the volume of documents when there should be little to
no emails and texts exchanged prior to the completion of the hiring
process.
A: There seems to
be a misunderstanding as to the breadth of the request made. It included five separate
requests for documents involving multiple individuals, including parties
outside of the school district, with no timeframe identified for the records
requested and some with no subject matter. After consultation with our IT
Department, due to the broad scope of the requests, we discovered that it will
take many hours of searching to determine whether responsive documents exist and
potentially many documents will be identified as possibly responsive—not
necessarily responsive. Those documents will then all need to be reviewed to
determine if they are (1) responsive to the requests; and (2) are actually a
public record and not subject to an exemption. This is not a simple request for
records, as you seem to have been led to believe.
13. Why is there a difference in the way the
School Committee conducts its "Public Comment Period" compared to
other boards? The Select Board allows topics NOT on the agenda to be discussed,
while the School Committee allows topics ONLY on the present agenda to be
discussed. The public should be allowed to discuss topics on the agenda during
the time they're being discussed, not on a separate agenda item. The public
should be allowed to discuss anything not on the agenda at this time. Please
clarify.
While the open meeting
law does not require any type of public participation in a meeting, the School
Committee routinely allots time for public comments. In an effort to respect
everyone’s time, the School Committee limits public comments to topics on the
agenda for that meeting.